MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612766801 · doi:10.1109/mmul.2017.40

Extreme-Dynamic-Range Sensing: Real-Time Adaptation to Extreme Signals

2017· article· en· W2612766801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Multimedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompositingComputer scienceDynamic rangeHigh dynamic rangeReal-time computingSalience (neuroscience)Wide dynamic rangeRange (aeronautics)Computer visionTone mappingArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new concept of coupled dynamic dynamic-range (D<;super>2<;/super>R) compositing operates by assembling sensor information, such as images or audio, from multiple "strong" and "weak" samplings or sensor snapshots, whose sensitivities drift and change over time, as lighting conditions or sound conditions change over time in their amplitude-domain properties. The authors introduce a feedback-control method to automatically adjust multiple exposure settings for compositing to increase the dynamic range of a sensory process such as video capture. The method uses a cost function to express uncertainty in the measurements from each sensor, along with salience detection, which are then fed into a dynamic control system. The system responds in real time to changing ambient conditions and sensor motion, asymptotically tracking the sensor controls to minimize uncertainty to capture an extremely high dynamic range for compositing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it