Une analyse des effets de composition du groupe-classe au Québec : influence de la ségrégation scolaire et des projets pédagogiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une étude menée auprès de 968 élèves en transition de l’enseignement élémentaire à l’enseignement secondaire au Québec. Il examine l’effet de l’offre de projets pédagogiques particuliers (PPP) sur la composition des groupes-classes et, de là, sur le rendement scolaire des élèves. L’analyse de plusieurs degrés prend appui sur le rendement obtenu à des tests standardisés en mathématiques à la fin de l’élémentaire et à la fin de la deuxième année du secondaire. L’organisation des PPP accroît les contrastes académiques et socioéconomiques entre les groupes-classes et il existe un effet délétère, sur le plan de la réussite scolaire d’un élève, à être scolarisé dans un groupe-classe où se concentrent des élèves ayant un rendement scolaire faible et d’origine socioéconomique plus défavorisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".