MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613702749

The Political Economy of Nigerias’ Trade Performance under Cotonou Agreement

2017· article· en· W2613702749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch on humanities and social sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Analysis and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree tradeInternational free trade agreementPoliticsDominance (genetics)Free trade agreementCape verdeInternational tradeEconomic partnership agreementReciprocity (cultural anthropology)LiberalizationGeographyPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsEconomyEconomicsEthnologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper primarily on thematic analyses of extant relevant literatures, examined the political economy of Nigeria’s’ trade performance under Cotonou agreement. The growth and dominance of regional integration blocs within the global community encouraged the establishment of Cotonou Partnership Agreement especially the provisions on trade. Indeed, the expansion of the EC from its original six members to Twelve and then Twenty-eight members, the formation of the North American Free Trade Area, championed by the United States and including Canada and Mexico and the Asia Pacific Economic Forum exemplify the global consciousness around the idea of bringing about a community of free trade areas in the world. The aim is to establish a form of free trade area between these blocs and Africa. Africa’s products will be allowed to enter these markets free of duty provided African countries are able and willing to reciprocate. In other words, under this initiative, the principle of reciprocity will be enforced. There is no doubt that the emergence of these trading blocs will undermine the African, Caribbean and Pacific group since all its members will now belong to one or the other of the emerging free trade blocks. The paper found amongst others that, based on analysis only Benin and Botswana export meat to the continent. Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Mal, The Sudan, Niger and Rwanda are the only countries to count live animals among their top five exports to the rest of the region. By the same measure, rice is only exported by Benin and Cape Verde, maize only by Malawi, and vegetables only by Eritrea, Ethiopia, the Niger and Sudan. Thus, we recommend that, since the thirty-one African countries are net exporters of agricultural raw materials to the world, while 37 countries are net importers of food items from the world. All countries that were net food importers from (or net food exporters to) the world were also net food importers from (or net food exporters to) Africa except for Djibouti, Benin, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, the Niger, Senegal, and Tunisia which had net exports to the Africa but imported from world, and Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Madagascar, and  Swaziland which had net imports from Africa but exported to the world, more efforts should be made by the regions organizations in Africa to courageously ride the African Nations of  corruption as that is the bane of progress in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.433
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.021 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it