MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613702749

The Political Economy of Nigerias’ Trade Performance under Cotonou Agreement

2017· article· en· W2613702749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chike Osegbue

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch on humanities and social sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Analysis and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree tradeInternational free trade agreementPoliticsDominance (genetics)Free trade agreementCape verdeInternational tradeEconomic partnership agreementReciprocity (cultural anthropology)LiberalizationGeographyPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsEconomyEconomicsEthnologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper primarily on thematic analyses of extant relevant literatures, examined the political economy of Nigeria’s’ trade performance under Cotonou agreement. The growth and dominance of regional integration blocs within the global community encouraged the establishment of Cotonou Partnership Agreement especially the provisions on trade. Indeed, the expansion of the EC from its original six members to Twelve and then Twenty-eight members, the formation of the North American Free Trade Area, championed by the United States and including Canada and Mexico and the Asia Pacific Economic Forum exemplify the global consciousness around the idea of bringing about a community of free trade areas in the world. The aim is to establish a form of free trade area between these blocs and Africa. Africa’s products will be allowed to enter these markets free of duty provided African countries are able and willing to reciprocate. In other words, under this initiative, the principle of reciprocity will be enforced. There is no doubt that the emergence of these trading blocs will undermine the African, Caribbean and Pacific group since all its members will now belong to one or the other of the emerging free trade blocks. The paper found amongst others that, based on analysis only Benin and Botswana export meat to the continent. Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Mal, The Sudan, Niger and Rwanda are the only countries to count live animals among their top five exports to the rest of the region. By the same measure, rice is only exported by Benin and Cape Verde, maize only by Malawi, and vegetables only by Eritrea, Ethiopia, the Niger and Sudan. Thus, we recommend that, since the thirty-one African countries are net exporters of agricultural raw materials to the world, while 37 countries are net importers of food items from the world. All countries that were net food importers from (or net food exporters to) the world were also net food importers from (or net food exporters to) Africa except for Djibouti, Benin, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, the Niger, Senegal, and Tunisia which had net exports to the Africa but imported from world, and Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Madagascar, and  Swaziland which had net imports from Africa but exported to the world, more efforts should be made by the regions organizations in Africa to courageously ride the African Nations of  corruption as that is the bane of progress in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.433
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.021 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch on humanities and social sciencesSame topicEconomic Analysis and PolicyFrench-language works237,207