MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613707555 · doi:10.3808/jei.201500290

Determining the Influence of Land Use Change and Soil Heterogeneities on Discharge, Sediment and Phosphorus

2015· article· en· W2613707555 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Informatics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceBayHydrology (agriculture)Surface runoffWatershedLand useSoil waterLand use, land-use change and forestrySedimentSWAT modelSoil scienceGeologyEcologyOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Southern Quebec’s Missisquoi Bay, a freshwater body in the northeastern portion of Lake Champlain is threatened by algal blooms arising from excess nutrient inputs contributed by agricultural watersheds which have their outlets in the bay. A version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, calibrated in a previous study to estimate annual runoff, sediment and total phosphorus (TP) fluxes from the Castor subwatershed into the Pike River watershed, which, in turn, flows into the Missisquoi Bay, used static landscapes and single land uses to arrive at its predictions. However, in reality, farmers do rotate crops. Therefore, the present study’s objective was to quantify the impact of soil heterogeneities on land use change patterns in the Castor subwatershed from 1999 to 2011. Data from a 24-point soil survey within the Castor subwatershed were partitioned and regionalized into 5, 10, 15, 20 and 24 heterogeneous regions or configurations. Using the standard soils map (with mean properties) employed in several prior studies in the subwatershed, a sixth configuration termed “Reference,” was also developed. All 6 configurations were factorially combined with either 1999 or 2011 land use data to yield 12 different versions of the SWAT model and quantify the heterogeneities and uncertainty of soil properties on land use change. For hydrology, it was discovered that there were no marked differences in the predictions, which was attributable to the use the SCS-CN subroutine which masks the physical properties of soil parameters within the same hydrologic group. We evaluated all the models for two periods i.e. 1991-1999 and 2000-2007. All the 1999 land use SWAT configurations underestimated runoff, sediment and TP whereas all the 2011 land use SWAT set ups gave higher and more accurate values. For both land use periods, the 5 Region models both showed higher and more accurate estimates, than those set ups with a greater number of regions, but were similar in accuracy to the Reference model set-ups. Since the 5-region configurations showed the highest within-zone heterogeneity, it can be concluded that having many regions (many sampling points as regions) does not necessarily increase SWAT’s prediction accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it