MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614218750 · doi:10.17713/ajs.v27i1&2.529

Estimation of the Parameters in the Double-periodic Model

2016· article· en· W2614218750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationMathematicsStatisticsEconometricsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The periodic behavior of environmental conditions and its effects on waiting time is of principal interest in a number of modeling problems. Dimitrov and Khalil (1992) have used a constructive approach to introduce a new class of probability distributions which exhibits the periodic behavior of environmental conditions in time and the random occurrence of some events on each time period. Further, the authors discussed some physical and probabilistic properties of the new class. In a more recent work, Dimitrov et al. (1996) investigated a somewhat more complicated case of modeling the waiting time to occurrence of a random event governed by random environment with driving periodic or double periodic structure. In this contribution, we will make use of these important results to find estimators of the parameters in the double periodic model, where after a given number of time periods, say m, the conditions start to repeat, the same as from the origin. Phenomena of this type appear in a series of environmental, maintenance and financial processes. In particular, we expect that investigators working in modeling environmental evolution with periodic behavior will find our new results useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it