MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W261428622

Relationships Play Primary Role in Boys' Learning: Positive Relationships Should Come First in Efforts to Improve Boys' Learning and Engagement with School. Teachers Can Make the Difference

2013· article· en· W261428622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Reichert, Richard A. Hawley

Bibliographic record

VenuePhi Delta Kappan · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeriousnessReverencePsychologyPassionClass (philosophy)Face (sociological concept)Mathematics educationSocial psychologySociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We begin our discussion with three poignant and illustrative anecdotes: Around a conference table with boys enrolled in an independent school in Toronto (a version of a private school in the U.S.), we are discussing when and how they respond positively to a teacher. Three of the boys, unalike physically or in their mannerisms, begin talking animatedly about their economics teacher who, one of them claims, ignited boys speak of this man with something like reverence. They describe the atmosphere in his classroom as somehow charged with importance. It's a one of them says, where you wouldn't think of acting teacher's presence, they explain, is not strict or commanding. elevated seriousness of his class seems to stem from the teacher's own seriousness about his subject. boys speak of his passion and the care he takes in responding to what they say and their written There is just something about one of the boys says. You would be ashamed not to do your work, your best work. Across the city, we are talking to a similar group of boys enrolled in a public school. discussion has turned to teachers the boys felt they could not respond to. One boy's face hardened noticeably when he described a hurtful encounter with a history teacher. boy, who described himself as frequently in trouble, had been sent out of class for a dress code violation: He was wearing a colored tee shirt under his code-required dress shirt. Since his outer shirt was in code and he felt the undershirt didn't really show, he was angry at being called out. As he stormed out into the hall, the teacher followed him and continued to berate him, concluding with You are such a punk. And, we asked, how did that make you feel? boy said with conviction, hate him. But, we persisted, you are still in the class, you have to work for him, right? boy said, not doing anything in that class. He can flunk me. They can kick me out. I'm not doing anything. In the course of a daylong workshop with students and teachers at a school outside of London in the U.K., a 17-year old boy recounted a French class in which he underperformed, didn't care for his teacher, and knew his teacher didn't care for boy reported disengaging from the class, and handing in partially prepared, sloppy work, which his teacher duly took in and awarded the failing marks it merited. By year's end, what had begun as wariness on the part of boy and teacher had devolved into mutual resentment and dislike. In the course of exchanges between the boy telling the story and the roomful of teachers who heard it, one teacher asked the boy, with some feeling, whether he didn't feel a responsibility to do what he could to repair the relationship. boy paused to reflect. Then said, suppose so. I can see that I was not easy to teach or to deal with -- but I was 13. When boys are not alright Amid growing concerns around the world about the prospects and performance of boys and men, a new, more dire thesis is emerging: We may have arrived at an end of men. Proponents ask whether postindustrial society is simply better suited to women? (Rosin, 2010). Greatly abetting if not outright causing this troubling downturn in male fortunes is their experience of school. With the American male dropout rate at or above 25% in many urban schools, underperformance in all disciplines and grade levels, and the consequent gap between male and female enrollment in colleges and graduate schools, demographers forecast a grim future for American males (Mortenson, 2011). In one cultural historian's bleak assessment, The evidence is overwhelming that boys of all ages are having trouble in schools. They are underachieving academically, acting out behaviorally, and disengaging psychologically (Kimmel, 2008, p. 71). Yet however troubling such claims may be about today's male students generally, those failures to engage in school and to achieve are neither universal nor normative. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.022
Scholarly communication0.0140.014
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhi Delta KappanSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207