MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614533249 · doi:10.1109/fpt.2016.7929181

High density, low energy, magnetic tunnel junction based block RAMs for memory-rich FPGAs

2016· article· en· W2614533249 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatic random-access memoryField-programmable gate arrayScalabilityComputer scienceTunnel magnetoresistanceEmbedded systemBlock (permutation group theory)Magnetoresistive random-access memoryNon-volatile memoryLogic blockComputer hardwareParallel computingMaterials scienceRandom access memoryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many important applications demand large amounts of on-chip memory both to fully utilize an FPGA's computational capacity and to minimize energy-consuming off-chip memory accesses, leading some recent commercial FPGAs to add higher-capacity on-chip block RAMs (BRAMs). While memory is becoming more important to FPGA designs, SRAM scaling is becoming more difficult because of increasing device variation. An alternative is to build FPGA BRAM from magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) cells as this emerging embedded memory features a small cell size, low energy usage, and good scalability. In this work, we conduct a detailed comparison study of SRAM and MTJ BRAMs that includes cell designs that are robust with device variation, transistor-level design and optimization of all the required BRAM-specific circuits, and variation-aware simulation at the 22nm node. We find that as the capacity of a BRAM increases, the MTJ benefits of high-density and low-energy increase and its drawback of lower speed is mitigated. At a 256 Kb block size, MTJ-BRAM is 3.06× denser and 55% more energy efficient and its F <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">max</sub> is 274 MHz, which is adequate for most FPGA system clock domains. We detail how the non-volatility of an MTJ-BRAM saves energy, especially for narrow write operations which are common for the width-configurable BRAMs of FPGAs. For a RAM architecture similar to the latest commercial FPGAs, MTJ-based block RAMs reduce the FPGA fabric area by 28%, or alternatively could expand FPGA memory capacity by 2.95× with no die size increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it