Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peut-on envisager de des enseignants professionnels (Paquay L., Altet M., Charlier E. & Perrenoud Ph., 1996, 1998, 2001) si les formateurs d'enseignants ne sont pas engages eux-memes dans un processus de professionnalisation ? Sur la base d'analyses de cas en formation initiale et en formation continue en Belgique, au Canada, en France et en Suisse, cet ouvrage fait le point sur les professionnalites des formateurs d'enseignants, sur leurs competences et leurs identites et sur la division du travail dans ce monde composite en mutation. Il analyse les processus de professionnalisation en cours, entre ideologie et realite. Il propose des dispositifs de formation et des pistes de reflexion pour former des formateurs professionnels, accompagnateurs des enseignants dans leur developpement professionnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it