MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614759802 · doi:10.1109/icde.2017.205

Multiple-Query Optimization of Regular Path Queries

2017· article· en· W2614759802 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSPARQLPath expressionPath (computing)GraphQuery optimizationQuery planGraph databaseSemantic WebTheoretical computer scienceWeb search queryInformation retrievalQuery languageRDFSearch engineSargableProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph databases have become increasingly important with the rise of social networks, and with the growth of the Semantic Web and characterization of biological networks. Regular path queries (RPQs) are a way to explore path patterns in graphs which have become a standard method to explore graph databases. SPARQL 1.1 includes property paths, and so now encompasses RPQs as a fragment. In many environments, such as visual query systems (VQSs), the RPQs are generated visually which may contain many commonalities that can be optimized globally. We introduce SWARMGUIDE, a framework for optimizing multiple regular path queries. The framework detects commonalities among the RPQs, in order to find an execution plan that is globally optimized over the plan spaces of the constituent RPQs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207