MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615238733 · doi:10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0019

Production planning problem with market impact under demand uncertainty

2017· article· en· W2615238733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Mechanical Design Systems and Manufacturing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsNewsvendor modelLagrangian relaxationMathematical optimizationProfit (economics)Budget constraintProduction planningInteger programmingProduction (economics)Optimization problemDecision problemInvestment (military)EconomicsMathematicsMicroeconomicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the production planning problem for a single manufacturer with the investment to improve the market impact under demand uncertainty. In the mathematical model, the average demand increases if the investment of market impact is increased for each product. The objective is to maximize the total profit with a piecewise linear investment cost and a budget constraint. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer nonlinear programming problem. A solution procedure based on Lagrangian relaxation is developed to solve the problem efficiently. In the proposed method, an analytical solution of the newsboy problem is effectively used to derive the lower and upper bounds. The condition of the concavity of the profit function is derived. The effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed through computational experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it