From the Mining to the Obtaining of Ferroelectric Ceramics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enjoy and learn by looking for the ancient techniques of working the pottery from the clay, led to the obtaining of more convenient materials and better mineral extractive processes. This is what has allowed the development of the great variety of domestic ceramic materials and the emergence of electro technical ceramic. The piezoelectric and ferroelectric ceramics depend on the origin of their raw materials, what has been the process of obtaining them? As well as on the variations of the ceramic process used. Five examples are presented of how the reagents, their purity, granulometry and present phases can modify the properties and characteristics of ferroelectric ceramics. The work will make a panoramic visualization of the materials and their origins, arriving at the obtaining of ferroelectric ceramics and the influence of the raw material (obtaining process) and the properties of the desired product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it