Single Image Rain Streak Decomposition Using Layer Priors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rain streaks impair visibility of an image and introduce undesirable interference that can severely affect the performance of computer vision and image analysis systems. Rain streak removal algorithms try to recover a rain streak free background scene. In this paper, we address the problem of rain streak removal from a single image by formulating it as a layer decomposition problem, with a rain streak layer superimposed on a background layer containing the true scene content. Existing decomposition methods that address this problem employ either sparse dictionary learning methods or impose a low rank structure on the appearance of the rain streaks. While these methods can improve the overall visibility, their performance can often be unsatisfactory, for they tend to either over-smooth the background images or generate -images that still contain noticeable rain streaks. To address the problems, we propose a method that imposes priors for both the background and rain streak layers. These priors are based on Gaussian mixture models learned on small patches that can accommodate a variety of background appearances as well as the appearance of the rain streaks. Moreover, we introduce a structure residue recovery step to further separate the background residues and improve the decomposition quality. Quantitative evaluation shows our method outperforms existing methods by a large margin. We overview our method and demonstrate its effectiveness over prior work on a number of examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".