MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620105308 · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000001323

Order Sets for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol

2017· article· en· W2620105308 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa Shea‐Budgell, Christiaan Schrag, Danielle O. Dumestre, Arezoo Astanehe, Claire Temple‐Oberle

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEnhanced Recovery After Surgery
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeAnesthesiaSurgeryBreast cancerPostoperative nausea and vomitingBreast surgeryNauseaCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to facilitate recovery from surgical procedures. They have been shown to reduce surgical morbidity and length of stay in hospital1,2 and may be associated with better cancer-specific survival.3 Until recently, there was no specific ERAS protocol for breast reconstruction. A newly developed and internationally relevant protocol, based on a systematic review and consensus recommendations, can now guide the optimal perioperative management of this patient population.4 Based on this protocol, we have developed detailed order sets, with specific drug names and doses. Such information may be useful for centers intending to implement an ERAS protocol for breast reconstruction. PREOPERATIVE ORDER SETS Preoperative ERAS guidelines call for limited fasting and carbohydrate loading, medications to reduce postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and risk of venous thromboembolism, and management of fluids.4 Our institution’s orders (Table 1) include a light snack up to 8 hours before surgery, clear fluids up to 3 hours before surgery, and consumption of a carbohydrate-rich juice the evening before and morning of surgery. We have included cefazolin, aprepitant, celecoxib, acetaminophen, dalteparin, hydromorphone, and gabapentin; doses are provided in Table 1. Our orders also include lactated ringers infusion by peripheral line at 125 mL/h continuous.Table 1.: Preoperative Order Sets for Patients Electing to Follow ERAS for Breast ReconstructionPOSTOPERATIVE DAY SURGERY ORDER SETS (IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION) Intra- and postoperative ERAS guidelines for day surgery patients are relatively straight forward.4 Our postoperative day surgery order set (Table 2) includes lactated ringers infusion by peripheral line at 30 mL/h continuous and saline lock once the patient is drinking well. Postoperative medications may include acetaminophen and gabapentin, as well as the following, as needed: codeine, ketorolac, hydromorphone or morphine, ondansetron, dimenhydrinate, and metoclopramide; doses are provided in Table 2. Discharge instructions include wound observation, drain care, and dressing care.Table 2.: Postoperative Order Sets for Day Surgery Patients Electing to Follow ERAS for Breast ReconstructionPOSTOPERATIVE INPATIENT ORDER SETS (FLAP RECONSTRUCTION) The order sets for patients undergoing abdominal flap reconstruction are more extensive (Table 2) and include early activity, early refeeding, nutritional supplementation, drain care teaching, regular surgical flap checks, and fluid management. Postoperative analgesic medications may include acetaminophen and gabapentin, as well as the following, as needed: oxycodone, codeine, and hydromorphone or morphine; doses are provided in Table 2. Postoperative antinauseants may include, as needed, ondansetron, dimenhydrinate, and metoclopramide. Laxatives may be used as needed. Measures for thromboembolism prophylaxis include dalteparin and a sequential compression device. Our order set also includes referral for physiotherapy assessment and treatment, including teaching around mobility and precaution with certain activities and patient education around wound care, drain care, and VTE prophylaxis. We have collected and analyzed data on outcomes associated with this order set in patients undergoing flap reconstruction, and a paper is pending. Our order sets operationalize ERAS recommendations that can be implemented into the health system. They add depth to the existing ERAS recommendations by providing a specific set of medications and interventions that institutions considering ERAS breast reconstruction protocols can adopt. Depending on the context, some custom tailoring of the order sets may be required. Our hope is that as other institutions adopt ERAS for breast reconstruction, we will see a growing body of comparably treated patients to allow for robust evaluation of quality, safety, and cost of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2510.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFrench-language works237,207