MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622332855 · doi:10.29311/mas.v13i4.344

Attempting intelligibility with the seemingly incomprehensible: Murambi, human remains and the Labour of Care

2015· article· en· W2622332855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMuseum and Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersYork UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsIntelligibility (philosophy)GenocideSubject (documents)SociologyEpistemologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLawArtComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I discuss the work carried out by the employees of the MurambiMemorial, a site commemorating Rwanda’s genocide, to highlight how theirwork-related responsibilities creates an opportunity for the memorial’s visitors tohave an intelligible encounter with the seemingly incomprehensible presence ofhuman remains. I introduce the concept of the Labour of Care, which provides abasis to think about how the work carried out by Murambi’s employees bestowsupon the human remains their interpretable qualities. From this basis, I examinehow this concept provides a means to think about human remains not simply asmaterial objects, but rather, better understood as subject-come-objects. By doingso, visitors can move beyond idealized notions of redemption and think abouthumanity’s unsettling capacity for violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it