MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Role-Based Multilevel Security Access Control Model

2016· article· en· W2622757767 on OpenAlexaff
Leon Pan, Chang N. Zhang, Cungang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Information Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer security modelAccess controlHierarchySecurity serviceComputer securityObject (grammar)Hierarchical database modelLogical securityControl (management)Theoretical computer scienceInformation securitySoftware security assuranceData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a Role-Based Multilevel Security Access Control (RBMSAC) model to address the multilevel security issue. In the proposed model, we introduce the concepts of secure permissions, secure objects (secure sub object hierarchy), and secure operations, and propose the method of decomposing a multilevel-security object into a number of sub objects and organizing them into a tree structure. With the embedded security criterion expressions in the secure sub objects and the embedded security criterion subset in the relevant secure operations, the model achieves the multilevel security access control by evaluating these security criterion expressions using the relevant security criterion subset. In addition to presenting the methods of generating new components, we also analyze the relationships among the new components, and discuss the rationale of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computer Information SystemsSame topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207