MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622893158 · doi:10.21803/pensam.v10i18.44

DECOLONIZAR Y QUEEREZAR LO DOCENTE: REPENSANDO EL DISCURSO CURRICULAR DE LA FORMACIO?N DOCENTE

2017· article· es· W2622893158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePensamiento Americano · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Cultural Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumQueerSociologyHumanitiesPedagogyGender studiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente arti?culo de re exio?n, se situ?a desde un pensamiento postcolonial en dia?logo con lo queer, que invita a repensar las pra?cticas discursivas en torno al curriculum de la formacio?n docente, pregunta?ndose entre otras cosas ¿de do?nde provienen?, ¿que? les da esa legitimidad?, ¿que? efectos producen?, con el n de problematizar de que? manera el curri?culum de formacio?n docente es responsable de signi car, apropiar y reproducir con guraciones identitarias, y formas de pensamiento que disciplinan y posibilitan modalidades diversas de proyectos vitales a trave?s de la accio?n formativa. Palabras clave: Decolonial, Queer, Discurso, Curriculo, Formacio?n Docente. Abstract The following reflective essay is situated within a postcolonial perspective in dialogue with queer theory, inviting to rethink the discursive practices around the curriculum of teacher education, asking - among other things- Where do these discourses and practices come from?, What gives them legitimacy?, What affects do they have?, as a way to problematize the ways in which the curriculum of teacher education is responsible of signifying, appropriating and reproducing identitarian configurations, as well as ways of thinking that discipline and allow for certain modalities of life projects through their formative action. Keywords: Decoloniality, Queer, Discourse, Curriculum, Teacher Education Resumo Este artigo re exa?o, e? localizado a partir de um pensamento po?s-colonial em dia?logo com o quer, convidando-o a repensar as pra?ticas discursivas do curri?culo de formac?a?o de professores, entre outras coisas perguntando de onde ele vir?, o que lhes da? a legitimidade?, qual e? o impacto?, a m de problematizar como o curri?culo da formac?a?o de professores e? responsa?vel de significar, apropriar e reproduzir con gurac?o?es identita?rias e formas de pensamento que disciplinam e permitir va?rias formas de projectos vitais atrave?s da formac?a?o. Palavras-chave: descolonial, Queer, Discurso, curri?culo, formac?a?o de professores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it