MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Les territoires imaginaires de l’altérité : divers aspects de la frontier dans les Amériques

2017· article· fr· W2625036535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces Brasil/Canadá · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On étudiera la géosymbolique de la frontière et de la frontier et leur relation aux altérités minoritaires. Dans deux livres similaires publiés par le musée des civilisations on parle, en anglais, des « Inuit communities were real communities not merely groups of people who happened to be living near one another ». Dans le livre en français, les Inuits « évoluent à l’intérieur d’une terre d’errance... au-delà d’une certaine limite, danger ». Chacun invente son minoritaire en fonction de ses angoisses identitaires liées à une défense des frontières. De nos jours toutefois, les territorialités symboliques même dans l’espace exigu du radeau dans L’histoire de Pi transforment la frontière en frontier par la domestication des peurs entre cultures autres. Ce réseautage domine ainsi l’immensité spatiale menaçante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it