Heterogeneous Task Allocation and Sequencing via Decentralized Large Neighborhood Search
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on decentralized task allocation and sequencing for multiple heterogeneous robots. Each task is defined as visiting a point in a subset of the robot configuration space — this definition captures a variety of tasks including inspection and servicing. The robots are heterogeneous in that they may be subject to different differential motion constraints. Our approach is to transform the problem into a multi-vehicle generalized traveling salesman problem (GTSP). To solve the GTSP, we propose a novel decentralized implementation of large-neighborhood search (LNS). Our solution approach leverages the GTSP insertion methods proposed in Fischetti et al. [A branch-and-cut algorithm for the symmetric generalized traveling salesman problem, Oper. Res. 45(3) (1997) 378–394]. to repeatedly remove and reinsert tasks from each robot path. Decentralization is achieved using combinatorial-auctions between the robots on tasks removed from robot’s path. We provide bounds on the length of the dynamically feasible robot paths produced by the insertion methods. We also show that the number of bids in each combinatorial auction, a crucial factor in the runtime, scales linearly with the number of tasks. Finally, we present extensive benchmarking results to characterize both solution quality and runtime, which show improvements over existing decentralized task allocation methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it