MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626509145 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r220-25

Communicating Flooding Issues to the Public at Large

2004· article· en· W2626509145 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrew McDonald, Andrew A. Mather, Wiero Vogelzang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication Studies and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)BusinessEnvironmental sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coastal area ofKwaZuluNatal is subject to regular flooding, ranging from severe regional flood events such as the 1987 floods when 300 people lost their lives to localised flash floods causing erosion damage.The city of Durban is particularly vulnerable to flood-related problems due to the large urban population and limited amount of developable land.In the past, residential and commercial/industrial development has taken place in flood prone areas placing lives and property at risk.The National Water Act of 1998 states that information relating to floods and potential risks must be made available to the public.The challenge for Durban, with hundreds ofkilometres of rivers located in the municipal area, has been to develop a programme to gather flood-related information, identify the parties to whom it should be distributed, and distribute the information in an efficient and appropriate manner.The use of geographical information systems (GIS) has enabled flood studies to be carried out quickly andinauniformmanner, with results beingloadeddirectlyinto the Municipality's GIS database.By storing the flood-related information in the GIS environment, it is available to other departments within the Municipality and also the general public via the eThekwini website.The main users of the information in the Municipality are the City Engineering Unit, Disaster Management Department and Development and Planning Department.In addition to the internet, the information is disseminated to the public through direct mailing and word based community Disaster Management Committees.Future developments will include devising better and more efficient ways of informing those living in McDonald, A., A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicCommunication Studies and MediaFrench-language works237,207