Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Atlantic history is a fast developing field of historical inquiry that operates upon new assumptions about how to understand the remarkable interactions between different peoples and cultures on four continents and many islands in the period between Columbus’ voyages to the New World in the late fifteenth century and the end of slavery in the Americas in the late nineteenth century. Its principal theme is the movement of peoples, ideas and things in the Atlantic World, which encompasses the Africa, Europe, North America and South America along with many islands, from the Canary Islands to the Caribbean islands to Bermuda. The multiple movements were fundamentally important in shaping the modern world and in making cultural diversity a key component of modern identity. Atlantic history differs from previous ways of looking at the transmission of cultural patterns in these regions by being determinedly polycentric rather than monocentric. In other words, the Atlantic world has no originating center and is not conceived as a world in which Europeans acted and other peoples reacted. It was, instead, a constantly evolving and changing world in which ideas, peoples, and things from disparate areas continually interacted in complex ways, initiating diverse and fascinating processes of historical change. The nature of Atlantic history means that there is an abundance of information of varying quality and numerous languages and sources. Oxford Bibliographies is the best means to access the information that scholars and students need to master this rapidly changing field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.253 | 0.087 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".