MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W26953334 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkw037

Integration and Communication in the Diaspora: Intersectionality and Community Facilitation through ICTs

2012· article· en· W26953334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericas Conference on Information Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiaspora, migration, transnational identity
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersAnglia Ruskin University
KeywordsDiasporaIntersectionalityICTSFacilitationCommunity integrationPopulationPolitical scienceSociologyInformation and Communications TechnologyEconomic geographyPublic relationsGeographyGender studiesDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been increasing interest in the dynamic characteristics of diaspora communities within the global community. In some cases, as with the Caribbean region, the diaspora community is larger than the Caribbean resident population. The process of transition and integration from national to host countries is one which can be supported by community organizations in the host country. Community access points, in particular, play a role in the development and integration of diasporic linkages. In this paper, we examine these interactions through interviews and observation of activities of members of the diaspora at community organizations in a host city. An important perspective of intersectionality arises as a platform for analysis given the varied approaches to integration and communication through ICTs that have to be considered based on the characteristics of the diaspora community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it