MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2697146589 · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2718524

Smart Grid Solution for Charging and Discharging Services Based on Cloud Computing Scheduling

2017· article· en· W2697146589 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingSmart gridScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceReliability (semiconductor)GridEnergy supplySupply chainDistributed computingReliability engineeringEngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Operating systemBusinessOperations managementElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart Grid (SG) technology represents an unprecedented opportunity to transfer the energy industry into a new era of reliability, availability, and efficiency that will contribute to our economic and environmental health. On the other hand, the emergence of electric vehicles (EVs) promises to yield multiple benefits to both power and transportation industry sectors, but it is also likely to affect the SG reliability, by consuming massive energy. Nevertheless, the plug-in of EVs at public supply stations must be controlled and scheduled in order to reduce the peak load. This paper considers the problem of plug-in EVs at public supply stations (EVPSS). A new communication architecture for SG and cloud services is introduced. Scheduling algorithms are proposed in order to attribute priority levels and optimize the waiting time to plug-in at each EVPSS. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first papers investigating the aforementioned issues using new network architecture for SG based on cloud computing. We evaluate our approach via extensive simulations and compare it with two other recently proposed works, based on real supply energy scenario in Toronto. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach when considering real EVs charging-discharging loads at peak-hours period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it