MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2723754966 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2016.0037

Supported Bodies: Prostheses, Disability, and Masculine Friendship in the Victorian Novel

2016· article· en· W2723754966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriendshipMasculinityPoetryConversationVirtueClass (philosophy)ArtHistorySociologyLiteratureGender studiesLawPhilosophyCommunicationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supported Bodies:Prostheses, Disability, and Masculine Friendship in the Victorian Novel Karen Bourrier (bio) The victorian body was bolstered, augmented, and supported by a variety of prostheses. In fact, Victorian literature and culture is populated with bodies supplemented by artifacts of material culture ranging from wheeled chairs to glass eyes, ear trumpets, and wooden legs. In Charles Dickens's work, middle-class invalids such as Mrs. Skewton are wheeled through the pages of Dombey and Son (1846–48) in Bath chairs, an early nineteenth-century improvement on the sedan chairs that were used primarily by the wealthy (Janechek 151–52). Prostheses to amplify hearing included not only the ear trumpet most famously used by Harriet Martineau (Esmail 170–72) but also patented innovations such as the otaphone, the audiphone, and the conversation tube (Virdi-Dhesi). Perhaps the most recognizable Victorian prosthesis is the wooden leg, borne by characters including Dickens's taxidermist Silas Wegg in Our Mutual Friend (1864–65). Wegg's peg leg marks him as both "morally dubious" and lower class (Sweet 16). Yet, prosthetic limbs were not solely the purview of a lower-class, damaged masculinity. As Vanessa Warne points out, the prosthesis could also signify wealth, a point that Thomas Hood makes in his satirical poem "Miss Kilmansegg and Her Precious Leg" (83–84). The prevalence of prosthetics to support the disabled Victorian body across boundaries of gender and class highlights the radical incompleteness of all bodies. As Kylee-Anne Hingston argues, when we define prosthetics as "technological extensions and enhancements and normalizing tools," the category expands to include not only mobility aids but also spectacles, suggesting the physical "limitations of all bodies" (371). Prostheses were one highly visual signifier of the ways in which Victorian bodies were physically supported. The illustration on the next page (fig. 1), from Dinah Craik's bestselling novel John Halifax, Gentleman (1856), shows the narrator, Phineas Fletcher, being supported not only by his crutches but also by his friend. Indeed, physical disability could lead to opportunities for emotional and physical support from others as the disabled body emphasized the need for interdependence (Stoddard Holmes 30). Craik's John Halifax, Gentleman and Charlotte Yonge's The Heir of Redclyffe (1853), two bestselling mid-Victorian novels, make the supported masculine body a central feature of their narratives.1 In fact, the narratives themselves are supported by disabled male characters, who act as stand-ins for the narrator or who narrate the novel itself. Yonge's Charles Edmonstone and Craik's Phineas Fletcher are both lifelong invalids who use the support not only of crutches but also of their friends and family to aid their mobility. In turn, because their powers of observation have been honed through years of physical suffering and social marginalization, and because as disabled men they are not subject to [End Page 34] the conventions of mid-Victorian masculinity, they are able to be effusive in their emotions and to narrate or focalize their strong friends' stories. Click for larger view View full resolution Fig 1. Illustration by Alice Barber Stephens from John Halifax, Gentleman (1897). Courtesy of the University of Pennsylvania Digital Library. Perhaps because there is greater tension between masculinity and disability than between femininity and disability, the figure of the disabled man licenses particularly emotionally and erotically charged scenes."I say there is no greater misery in this world than to have the spirit of a man and the limbs of a cripple," exclaims Charles Edmonstone when his disabilities hamper him from taking on the active role he craves (Yonge 239). Disability, and the physical support it requires, can also lead to moments of tenderness. In the fictional worlds of Craik and Yonge, masculine disability leads to homoerotically charged scenes as other men take care of Charles and Phineas. The guests gathered for the protagonist's wedding in The Heir of Redclyffe see not the bride and groom entering the house together but the groom and his disabled cousin, as the groom assists "Charles up the step, his brilliant hazel eyes and glowing healthy complexion contrasting with Charles's pale, fair, delicate face, and features sharpened and refined by suffering" (376). The bride follows the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it