MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2724081917 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2017.2711360

Domain Adaptation Using Representation Learning for the Classification of Remote Sensing Images

2017· article· en· W2724081917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Domain adaptationMachine learningHyperspectral imagingPrincipal component analysisContextual image classificationFeature learningInvariant (physics)Artificial neural networkRepresentation (politics)Kernel (algebra)Deep learningImage (mathematics)Classifier (UML)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional machine learning (ML) techniques are often employed to perform complex pattern recognition tasks for remote sensing images, such as land-use classification. In order to obtain acceptable classification results, these techniques require there to be sufficient training data available for every particular image. Obtaining training samples is challenging, particularly for near real-time applications. Therefore, past knowledge must be utilized to overcome the lack of training data in the current regime. This challenge is known as domain adaptation (DA), and one of the common approaches to this problem is based on finding invariant representations for both the training and test data, which are often assumed to come from different “domains.” In this study, we consider two deep learning techniques for learning domain-invariant representations: Denoising autoencoders (DAE) and domain-adversarial neural networks (DANN). While the DAE is a typical two-stage DA technique (unsupervised invariant representation learning followed by supervised classification), DANN is an end-to-end approach where invariant representation learning and classification are considered jointly during training. The proposed techniques are applied to both hyperspectral and multispectral images under different DA scenarios. Results obtained show that the proposed techniques outperform traditional approaches, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and kernel PCA, and can also compete with a fully supervised model in the multispatial scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it