MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2726511607 · doi:10.5539/enrr.v7n3p16

Increase in the Number of Hot Days for Decades in Puerto Rico 1950-2014

2017· article· en· W2726511607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Natural Resources Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnvironmental and Ecological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsAnimal sciencePeriod (music)Environmental scienceDemographyMathematicsBiologyPhysicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results show that the number of days with temperatures higher than 32 °C has increased, and the number of days with a minimum temperature of 15 °C has decreased. The average temperature on the island has increased by 2.24 °C in the period analyzed. The increase in the minimum temperature is more than two times greater than the increase in the maximum temperature in the analyzed period. The number of days with temperatures over 32 ° C is three times more than the number of days with temperatures below 15 °C.When analyzing the behavior per decade it is found that there is an increase in the ratio between cold and warm days, from the 1950s, which was from 1: 1.79 to that of 2000-2019, which is 1: 3.28.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it