Topology optimization using a continuous density field and adaptive mesh refinement
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
- Genre
- Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: Methods
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.169
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.832
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Summary A new method of topology optimization is introduced in which a continuous material field is combined with adaptive mesh refinement. Using a continuous material field with different analysis and design meshes allows the method to produce optimal designs that are free of numerical artifacts like checkerboard patterns and material islands. Adaptive mesh refinement is then applied to both meshes to precisely locate the optimal boundary of the final structure. A Helmholtz‐type density filter is used to prevent the appearance of small topological features as the mesh refinement proceeds. Results are presented for several test problems, including problems with geometrically complex domain boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
- Topic
- Topology Optimization in Engineering
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- York UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Polygon meshAdaptive mesh refinementTopology optimizationTopology (electrical circuits)Boundary (topology)Helmholtz free energyField (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer scienceMesh generationCheckerboardMathematical optimizationFilter (signal processing)MathematicsApplied mathematicsFinite element methodComputational scienceGeometryMathematical analysisStructural engineeringEngineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes