MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728427291 · doi:10.1177/0962280217708671

Bayesian cure rate models induced by frailty in survival analysis

2017· article· en· W2728427291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistical Methods in Medical Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityComputer scienceBayesian inferencePoisson distributionInferenceMarkov chainEconometricsStatisticsSurvival analysisMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frailty models provide a convenient way of modeling unobserved dependence and heterogeneity in survival data which, if not accounted for duly, would result incorrect inference. Gamma frailty models are commonly used for this purpose, but alternative continuous distributions are possible as well. However, with cure rate being present in survival data, these continuous distributions may not be appropriate since individuals with long-term survival times encompass zero frailty. So, we propose here a flexible probability distribution induced by a discrete frailty, and then present some special discrete probability distributions. We specifically focus on a special hyper-Poisson distribution and then develop the corresponding Bayesian simulation, influence diagnostics and an application to real dataset by means of intensive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. These illustrate the usefulness of the proposed model as well as the inferential results developed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.080
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0800.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.285
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it