A Reliability-Aware Network Service Chain Provisioning With Delay Guarantees in NFV-Enabled Enterprise Datacenter Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, service-specific network functions (NFs) (e.g., Firewall, intrusion detection system, etc.) are executed by installation-and maintenance-costly hardware middleboxes that are deployed within a datacenter network following a strictly ordered chain. NF virtualization (NFV) virtualizes these NFs and transforms them into instances of plain software referred to as virtual NFs (VNFs) and executed by virtual machines, which, in turn, are hosted over one or multiple industry-standard physical machines. The failure (e.g., hardware or software) of any one of a service chain's VNFs leads to breaking down the entire chain and causing significant data losses, delays, and resource wastage. This paper establishes a reliability-aware and delay-constrained (READ) routing optimization framework for NFV-enabled datacenter networks. READ encloses the formulation of a complex mixed integer linear program (MILP) whose resolution yields an optimal network service VNF placement and traffic routing policy that jointly maximizes the achieved respective reliabilities of supported network services and minimizes these services' respective end-to-end delays. A heuristic algorithm dubbed Greedy-k-shortest paths (GSP) is proposed for the purpose of overcoming the MILP's complexity and develop an efficient routing scheme whose results are comparable to those of READ's optimal counterparts. Thorough numerical analyses are conducted to evaluate the network's performance under GSP, and hence, gauge its merit; particularly, when compared to existing schemes, GSP exhibits an improvement of 18.5% in terms of the average end-to-end delay as well as 7.4% to 14.8% in terms of reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".