MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2731205484 · doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2017.06.003

Description of induced anisotropy in microstructure of granular soils

2017· article· en· W2731205484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSOILS AND FOUNDATIONS · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnisotropyGranular materialMicrostructureDeformation (meteorology)Materials scienceDiscrete element methodWork (physics)Geotechnical engineeringStress (linguistics)GeomechanicsGeologyGeometryMechanicsComposite materialPhysicsOpticsMathematicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary focus in this work is on developing a methodology for specification of an evolution law which correlates the changes in the fabric of granular soil with the continuing deformation. The fabric descriptors are based on lineal intercept measurements and include the areal pore size and the mean intercept length distribution. The approach involves performing a series of Discrete Element simulations for a granular assembly under evolving directions of the principal stress/strain and defining a correlation with the evolution of material axes. It is demonstrated that granular materials with spherical particles may become anisotropic as a result of a continuing deformation process. For dense assemblies characterized by a high macroscopic friction angle (e.g., dense sand), the evolution law governing this induced anisotropy may be defined by assuming coaxiality between the microstructure and the total strain tensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it