Machine Learning Framework for the Detection of Mental Stress at Multiple Levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental stress has become a social issue and could become a cause of functional disability during routine work. In addition, chronic stress could implicate several psychophysiological disorders. For example, stress increases the likelihood of depression, stroke, heart attack, and cardiac arrest. The latest neuroscience reveals that the human brain is the primary target of mental stress, because the perception of the human brain determines a situation that is threatening and stressful. In this context, an objective measure for identifying the levels of stress while considering the human brain could considerably improve the associated harmful effects. Therefore, in this paper, a machine learning (ML) framework involving electroencephalogram (EEG) signal analysis of stressed participants is proposed. In the experimental setting, stress was induced by adopting a well-known experimental paradigm based on the montreal imaging stress task. The induction of stress was validated by the task performance and subjective feedback. The proposed ML framework involved EEG feature extraction, feature selection (receiver operating characteristic curve, t-test and the Bhattacharya distance), classification (logistic regression, support vector machine and naïve Bayes classifiers) and tenfold cross validation. The results showed that the proposed framework produced 94.6% accuracy for two-level identification of stress and 83.4% accuracy for multiple level identification. In conclusion, the proposed EEG-based ML framework has the potential to quantify stress objectively into multiple levels. The proposed method could help in developing a computer-aided diagnostic tool for stress detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".