MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734981119 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912325

PROSAC: a submillimeter array survey of low-mass protostars

2009· article· en· W2734981119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatorySmithsonian InstitutionNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAcademia SinicaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCanadian Space AgencySpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsProtostarPhysicsAstrophysicsSubmillimeter ArrayStarsMillimeterStar formationAstronomyRadiative transferMolecular cloudYoung stellar objectCircumstellar disk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Context. <i/>The key question about early protostellar evolution is how matter is accreted from the large-scale molecular cloud, through the circumstellar disk onto the central star.<i>Aims. <i/>We constrain the masses of the envelopes, disks, and central stars of a sample of low-mass protostars and compare the results to theoretical models for the evolution of young stellar objects through the early protostellar stages.<i>Methods. <i/>A sample of 20 Class 0 and I protostars has been observed in continuum at (sub)millimeter wavelengths at high angular resolution (typically 2″) with the submillimeter array. Using detailed dust radiative transfer models of the interferometric data, as well as single-dish continuum observations, we have developed a framework for disentangling the continuum emission from the envelopes and disks, and from that estimated their masses. For the Class I sources in the sample HCO<sup>+<sup/> 3–2 line emission was furthermore observed with the submillimeter array. Four of these sources show signs of Keplerian rotation, making it possible to determine the masses of the central stars. In the other sources the disks are masked by optically thick envelope and outflow emission.<i>Results. <i/>Both Class 0 and I protostars are surrounded by disks with typical masses of about 0.05 , although significant scatter is seen in the derived disk masses for objects within both evolutionary stages. No evidence is found for a correlation between the disk mass and evolutionary stage of the young stellar objects. This contrasts the envelope mass, which decreases sharply from <i>∼<i/>1 in the Class 0 stage to in the Class I stage. Typically, the disks have masses that are 1–10% of the corresponding envelope masses in the Class 0 stage and 20–60% in the Class I stage. For the Class I sources for which Keplerian rotation is seen, the central stars contain 70–98% of the total mass in the star-disk-envelope system, confirming that these objects are late in their evolution through the embedded protostellar stages, with most of the material from the ambient envelope accreted onto the central star. Theoretical models tend to overestimate the disk masses relative to the stellar masses in the late Class I stage.<i>Conclusions. <i/>The results argue in favor of a picture in which circumstellar disks are formed early during the protostellar evolution (although these disks are not necessarily rotationally supported) and rapidly process material accreted from the larger scale envelope onto the central star.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it