MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735321045 · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963342

Using invariance to extract signal from noise

2017· article· en· W2735321045 on OpenAlexaff
Debarshi Patanjali Ghoshal, Kumar Gopalakrishnan, H. Michalska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspace topologyEstimatorNoise (video)MathematicsProjection (relational algebra)Differential (mechanical device)Control theory (sociology)Linear subspaceLinear systemApplied mathematicsNoise measurementSIGNAL (programming language)Hilbert spaceState (computer science)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysisPure mathematicsArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown how differential invariance can be used to extract an underlying signal from its noisy measurement towards constructing a non-asymptotic state estimator for linear systems. While the model of the system is assumed known, the noise can have arbitrary characteristics. The differential invariance is rendered by the Cayley-Hamilton theorem and the system is represented in terms of a output reproducing functional on a Hilbert subspace. High accuracy, full state estimation of the system is achieved over arbitrary time intervals by way of orthogonal projection onto the subspace that represents the system invariance. Although the results are presented here primarily with reference to SISO LTI systems they readily extend to LTV systems with multiple outputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207