MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735321045 · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963342

Using invariance to extract signal from noise

2017· article· en· W2735321045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspace topologyEstimatorNoise (video)MathematicsProjection (relational algebra)Differential (mechanical device)Control theory (sociology)Linear subspaceLinear systemApplied mathematicsNoise measurementSIGNAL (programming language)Hilbert spaceState (computer science)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysisPure mathematicsArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown how differential invariance can be used to extract an underlying signal from its noisy measurement towards constructing a non-asymptotic state estimator for linear systems. While the model of the system is assumed known, the noise can have arbitrary characteristics. The differential invariance is rendered by the Cayley-Hamilton theorem and the system is represented in terms of a output reproducing functional on a Hilbert subspace. High accuracy, full state estimation of the system is achieved over arbitrary time intervals by way of orthogonal projection onto the subspace that represents the system invariance. Although the results are presented here primarily with reference to SISO LTI systems they readily extend to LTV systems with multiple outputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207