Asphaltene Subfractions Responsible for Stabilizing Water-in-Crude Oil Emulsions. Part 3. Effect of Solvent Aromaticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whole asphaltenes (WA) were fractionated by the E-SARA method according to their adsorption characteristics at oil–water interfaces from either toluene or heptol solutions. Heptol, a mixture of n -heptane and toluene at a 1:1 volume ratio, is a less aromatic solvent than toluene. The effect of solvent aromaticity on the composition of resulting asphaltene subfractions at oil–water interfaces was studied to determine the key functional groups that are critical to the asphaltene-induced stabilization of water-in-oil (W/O) petroleum emulsions. The interfacially active asphaltenes (IAA) were extracted as materials irreversibly adsorbed onto emulsified water droplets, while the asphaltenes remaining in the oil phase were considered as remaining asphaltenes (RA). Although toluene-extracted interfacially active asphaltenes (T-IAA) accounted for only 1.1 ± 0.3 wt % of WA, this subfraction of asphaltenes exhibited a greater interfacial activity and formed more rigid films at the oil–water interface than IAA extracted using heptol, known as HT-IAA which accounted for 4.2 ± 0.3 wt % of WA. The increased potential of T-IAA to stabilize W/O emulsions was attributed to their higher content of oxygen, resulting in a higher content of sulfoxide groups, as verified by elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Although the toluene-extracted remaining asphaltenes (T-RA) and heptol-extracted remaining asphaltenes (HT-RA) were shown to contain similar H/C ratios and nitrogen contents to those of T-IAA and HT-IAA, the two RA subfractions contained a much less amount of sulfur and oxygen, leading to a much reduced interfacial activity as compared with that of IAA subfractions. In spite of the small proportions in asphaltenes, oxygen-containing functional groups, in particular sulfoxides, were believed to contribute significantly to the increased stability of asphaltene-stabilized W/O petroleum emulsions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".