MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736047845 · doi:10.1002/cnma.201700154

Self‐Assembly of Nucleobase, Nucleoside and Nucleotide Coordination Polymers: From Synthesis to Applications

2017· article· en· W2736047845 on OpenAlexafffund
Anand Lopez, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemNanoMat · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNucleobaseMaterials scienceCombinatorial chemistryNanotechnologyPolymerMetal ions in aqueous solutionCoordination complexLanthanideSelf-healing hydrogelsNucleotideBiocompatibilityPolymerizationMetalChemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With multiple metal binding sites, nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides form various coordination polymers (CPs) with metal ions. These self‐assembled materials are very interesting for their simplicity to prepare, highly tunable structure and properties, and excellent biocompatibility. Polymerization is achieved under ambient conditions without the need of free radical initiators or UV light. Different nucleobases have different metal‐binding preferences, but in general most of their coordination sites prefer borderline or soft metals, while the phosphate groups in the nucleotides prefer hard Lewis acids. In this Focus Review, recent developments in this field are summarized starting from the synthesis and characterization of these CPs. Various metal ions including gold, silver, lanthanides, zinc, copper, and iron are individually reviewed, and each metal brings its own property into the CP materials. While most of these materials are non‐crystalline nanoparticles, under certain conditions crystalline metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) and hydrogels can also be prepared. The applications of such CPs are then described including enzyme entrapment, drug loading and delivery, biosensor development, catalysis, coating of nanoparticles, and luminescence. Finally, future research opportunities of this field are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemNanoMatSame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207