Şcoala de la Toronto. Contribuţia lui Harold Innis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the Toronto School of Communication and to Harold Innis, who is recognized as the founding father of this school even by its most famous representative, Marshall McLuhan. The analysis focuses on the central concept of Innis’ work, that of bias of communication. Innis’ inquiry is mainly historical, meaning that the author seeks to identify the influence of media in creating a time or a space bias. Despite this historical character, the core of his investigation is the bias of contemporary civilization. According to the Canadian author, this bias is a consequence of the monopoly of knowledge created by the prevalence of written press, by its obsession with space at the expense of time. Contemporary civilization is excessively concerned with the present time and obscures both past and future. A certain type of rigidity emerges, accompanied by reluctance to explore and exploit other dimensions then the space-related ones. The paper makes some clarifications regarding the “technological determinism” usually associated with the Toronto School. The analysis shows that this is an oversimplification, since the core of Innis’ work is that only the balance between space and time can provide for the long-term survival of civilizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it