MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736449195

The Hero's Quest and the Cycles of Nature: An Ecological Interpretation of World Mythology

2017· article· en· W2736449195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMythlore · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHEROMythologyInterpretation (philosophy)Meaning (existential)Argument (complex analysis)Natural (archaeology)HistoryLiteratureAestheticsEnvironmental ethicsSociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyArtClassicsArchaeologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE HERO'S QUEST AND THE CYCLES OF NATURE: AN ECOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF WORLD MYTHOLOGY. Rachel s. McCoppin. McFarland, 2016. 232 pp. ISBN 978-1476662015. $35.00. AS RACHEL MCCOPPIN EXPLAINED IN AN ONLINE INTERVIEW following release of her previous book, The Hero's Quest and Cycles of Nature: An Ecological Interpretation of World Mythology, Many cultures conceived of humans as inseparable from natural world, as equal to other living beings, and believed that time was cyclical, not linear, because death was something that appeared temporary. Therefore, many myths from cultures focus on message that death for all living beings is only one moment an endless, natural cycle--in spring and summer elements thrive, but fall and winter they wither and die [...]. When myths present humans as also adhering to this natural cycle, message of meaning of life and death is arguably a very different message than ones our contemporary culture offers. (Paul) Here McCoppin rather clearly articulates what she sees as central message of this second offering. Unfortunately, volume itself (like its predecessor) often muddies water as McCoppin unfolds her argument, and as this review will explain, still caused reviewer frustration several respects. On positive side, current volume is more focused and tightly argued than first, with fewer rough spots prose and a more inclusive (yet still incomplete) index. For example, it is missing entries such as Crete/Minoan culture and as well as important terms such as botanical hero-definition, and nature-dependent culture, perhaps because she does not clearly define either a succinct way within text. There are many thematic parallels between her first work and this one. As her previous volume, she draws examples from a wide variety of cultures, here including Rig Veda and Indo-European myth, Greek traditions such as Homer's Iliad and Odyssey and myth of Jason and Argonauts, Arthurian legend, Norse Volsunga Saga, Beowulf, Epic of Gilgamesh, and African, Native American, Inuit, and Slav myth (among others). She also continues her methodology of attempting to trace evolution of mythology from Paleolithic and Neolithic times, especially as it relates to Mother Earth Goddess. Indeed, many ways, this volume appears to be an expansion of an important thread her previous work, namely use of seasonal cycles mythology. This can be seen subtitle of book, touting it as an interpretation of world (the term usually referring to relations between life and environment). But it must be noted that author is particularly focusing on one very narrow part of ecological message of world mythology, inventing term botanical (i.e. relating to plants and their growth cycle) to describe her theoretical construct of hero in terms of a personification of nature (McCoppin 1). From beginning of her Preface McCoppin clearly sets her hero as superior to modern American superhero. She chastises this modern mythic construction (what has been termed American Monomyth by Jewitt and Lawrence) as a misrepresentation of mythic heroes, claiming it poses a disservice [...] to integrity of mythology. Myths of hero are for education of audience. The of heroic myth must relate to hero, so that wisdom hero gains is embraced by audience (2). Such superheroes are not relatable, and hence mythic message is lost. McCoppin also sets up a strong underlying ecological undertone for book, proclaiming that the wisdom audiences can receive from heroes educates them on necessity of embracing one's role within nature. Given current state of environmental destruction found our times, it is imperative that humanity remembers their tie to earth (2). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it