MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737500496 · doi:10.17975/sfj-2017-010

Nanoscale flow cytometry of patient plasma for the detection of prostate cancer-associated extracellular vesicles

2017· article· en· W2737500496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSTEM Fellowship Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMicrovesiclesCD63Flow cytometryExtracellular vesicleBiotinylationProstate-specific antigenAntigenProstateCancerExosomeChemistryCancer researchAntibodyBiologyMolecular biologyMedicineImmunologyInternal medicinemicroRNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Prostate cancer is the predominant cancer in men, affecting one in seven men during their lifetime. Current tests for prostate cancer include the digital rectal exam and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are submicron particles that participate in intercellular cross-talk by releasing cell mediators such as microRNA, carbohydrates and proteins. While they are known to express the broad tetraspanin family of proteins, i.e. CD9/CD63, prostate cancer-derived EVs have also been found to express PSA and six transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate (STEAP1). Traditionally, scientists have purified these EVs through ultracentrifugation. Here we propose a tandem purification of patient plasma, followed by nanoscale flow cytometry (A50+) as a novel method to detect tumour-derived EVs. Materials and Methods Plasma was obtained from healthy volunteers, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and patients with metastatic prostate cancer. CD9, CD63, PSA and STEAP1 were used as primary antibodies for the purification of EVs from neat plasma. To perform the purification in tandem, Protein G immunoprecipitation using CD9 and PSA was carried out first, followed by immunoaffinity purification with biotinylated CD63 and STEAP1. First and second elutions were collected for the enumeration of dual positive events by A50+. Initial histogram overlays and bivariate plots of neat and purified plasma were computed, then exported as comma-separated values for mathematical modelling by MATLAB. Results Strong dual positive EV populations from patient plasma were optimised, demonstrating that the method enriches tumour-derived EVs from neat samples of patient plasma. This was observed for HVs, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer patients with Gleason 4+4. Enrichment in these purified samples was measured by A50+ and demonstrated by overlaying purified and non-purified histoplots by MATLAB. Additional results show that PSA and STEAP1 can be adapted to detect single or dual positive populations of tumour-associated EVs in prostate cancer patients. Discussions and Conclusions This study suggests that tandem purification of tumour-associated EVs and A50+ analysis from plasma of prostate cancer patients can lead to earlier diagnosis and risk stratification, compared to traditional screening tests and aspiration cytology. Future studies will be directed toward optimizing this detection method for markers of other cancer types to achieve better outcomes in cancer detection and prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it