MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738612849 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2017.2729458

Bit-Flip Detection-Driven Selection of Trace Signals

2017· article· en· W2738612849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDebuggingTRACE (psycholinguistics)Computer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)SoftwareFocus (optics)Identification (biology)Bit (key)Extension (predicate logic)ChipEmbedded systemComputer engineeringProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since integrating memory blocks on-chip became affordable, embedded logic analysis has been used extensively for post-silicon validation and debugging. Deciding at design time which signals to be traceable at the post-silicon phase, has been posed as an algorithmic problem a decade ago. The primary focus of the subsequent approaches on this topic was to restore as much data as possible within a software simulator in order to facilitate the analysis of functional bugs, assuming there are no electrically induced design errors, e.g., bit-flips. In this paper, we show that analyzing post-silicon traces can also aid with the identification bit-flips. We present a new trace signals selection algorithm that is driven by the detection of bit-flips.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it