The use of internet for health purposes in Brazil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A symposium entitled "Stuffy Noses, Long Faces and Dental Malocclusion" was sponsored by the University of Toronto and attended by dentists, orthodontists and otolaryngologists. The orthodontists presented a large body of evidence which supported the view that in children, obstruction of the upper airway contributed to anomalies in facial growth and dental development. The nasal airflow laboratory reported that elevated nasal airflow resistance was encountered in 691 of 1,000 consecutive pediatric patients suspected of nasal obstruction. In more than half of those with elevated resistance the obstruction was due to mucosal swelling, while 25% were obstructed by adenoid hypertrophy and only 16% by structural abnormality. A panel discussion revealed that the orthodontic practitioners were anxious for a rapid, effective treatment in patients with nasal obstruction in order to minimize the effects on dental development. On the other hand, the otolaryngologists tended more to the view that the problems of the airway would be self-limiting and that expectant therapy was sufficient. It became evident that better communication and interchange of ideas between the various medical and dental practitioners caring for these children would be beneficial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it