Performance Improvement of Cluster-Based Routing Protocol in VANET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicular ad-hoc NETworks (VANETs) have received considerable attention in recent years, due to its unique characteristics, which are different from mobile ad-hoc NETworks, such as rapid topology change, frequent link failure, and high vehicle mobility. The main drawback of VANETs network is the network instability, which yields to reduce the network efficiency. In this paper, we propose three algorithms: cluster-based life-time routing (CBLTR) protocol, Intersection dynamic VANET routing (IDVR) protocol, and control overhead reduction algorithm (CORA). The CBLTR protocol aims to increase the route stability and average throughput in a bidirectional segment scenario. The cluster heads (CHs) are selected based on maximum lifetime among all vehicles that are located within each cluster. The IDVR protocol aims to increase the route stability and average throughput, and to reduce end-to-end delay in a grid topology. The elected intersection CH receives a set of candidate shortest routes (SCSR) closed to the desired destination from the software defined network. The IDVR protocol selects the optimal route based on its current location, destination location, and the maximum of the minimum average throughput of SCSR. Finally, the CORA algorithm aims to reduce the control overhead messages in the clusters by developing a new mechanism to calculate the optimal numbers of the control overhead messages between the cluster members and the CH. We used SUMO traffic generator simulators and MATLAB to evaluate the performance of our proposed protocols. These protocols significantly outperform many protocols mentioned in the literature, in terms of many parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".