MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741125120 · doi:10.1109/icc.2017.7996693

A low complexity soft-output data detection scheme based on Jacobi method for massive MIMO uplink transmission

2017· article· en· W2741125120 on OpenAlexaff
Fan Jiang, Cheng Li, Zijun Gong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational complexity theoryMIMOAlgorithmComputer scienceTelecommunications linkInitializationMinimum mean square errorInversion (geology)Iterative methodMultiuser detectionCovariance matrixMathematical optimizationMathematicsEstimatorChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsStatisticsCode division multiple access

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, linear minimum mean-square error (MMSE) detection can achieve near-optimal performance. However, it suffers from high computational complexity due to the involvement of matrix inversion. This issue becomes severer when user number (U) and receive antenna number (S) increase. Existing approaches such as Neumann series expansion method, Gauss-Seidel and Jacobi methods, can partly address this issue by approaching the matrix inversion with matrix multiplications or solving linear equations with iterative methods, respectively. However, matrix multiplications and the initialization for iterative methods are still costly. In this paper, we propose a further improved Jacobi method based soft-output massive MIMO detection scheme. The contributions include the use of matrix-vector product and a new approach to compute the log likelihood ratio (LLR). By using the matrix-vector product, the overall computational complexity is reduced from O (B × U2) to O(B × U). The new approach uses the noise-plus-interference (NPI) from the MMSE estimation, instead of using that from the first iteration. We then propose an approximation method to obtain the covariance of the NPI from MMSE estimation. Finally, we demonstrate through numerical simulations that the proposed scheme outperforms the existing schemes in terms of computational complexity and system bit error rate performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207