MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741287839 · doi:10.59236/td2011vol5iss21341

Using Blended Learning to Foster Education in a Contemporary Classroom

2011· article· en· W2741287839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlended learningComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationBrainstormingAsynchronous learningMultimediaMerge (version control)Emerging technologiesThe InternetTeaching methodEducational technologySynchronous learningMathematics educationArtificial intelligenceCooperative learningWorld Wide WebPsychologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new era of technology is bringing promising prospects, accompanied by numerous new challenges for educators.Traditional methods, such as face-to-face teaching, are experiencing substantial transformations by utilizing these innovative technologies, many of which are instructional tools.To understand the complimentary opportunities and challenges, it will be beneficial to understand the new tools primarily based on computers, multimedia, internet and online interactive techniques.Leading contemporary solutions can be classified firstly as e-learning, an asynchronous technique using only innovative technologies without a real class for teaching, and secondly as blended learning, employing mixture of synchronous and asynchronous techniques by means of both face-to-face, online, and offline methods for instruction.This paper briefly reviews the different stages of admittance of new tools as a means of instruction based on the literature and our own experience with blended learning.Analysis of contemporary solutions, e-learning and blended learning will be presented along with their strengths and limitations.This paper suggests schemes to merge innovative technologies with traditional techniques that include design assessment, financial, technical and human requirement.Authors recommend keeping the spirit of traditional techniques alive without losing the extra edge that can be accomplished by augmenting traditional techniques with the latest technology development.Furthermore, it is an effort to encourage readers to brainstorm further to take full advantage of different techniques to enhance educational experience of the learner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it