Temporal and Spatial Load Management Methods for Cost and Emission Reduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To address the challenge of climate change, reducing emissions due to electric power generation and consumption has received increasing attention worldwide. The previous research efforts have been focused on emission reduction on the generation side, but the positive impacts through demand side load management are often ignored. This paper explores the models of load management to reduce cost and emissions. Five different load management methods are studied and compared using the IEEE 14-bus system and the IEEE 57-bus system. Two of them are centralized methods, i.e., temporal and/or spatial load management schemes that need to have global system information to optimize the overall load management in a whole control area. The remaining three are decentralized methods focusing on the customer side, including a basic self-optimizing method and two advanced self-optimizing methods [sliding window self-optimizing load management and day-ahead self-optimizing load management (DA-SOLM)]. The advanced SOLM schemes need multiple communications between an independent system operator and customers. The results show that the temporal and spatial load management can achieve an effective reduction in cost and emission and the DA-SOLM, especially for a large power system, is able to mitigate locational marginal price spikes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it