MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743059945 · doi:10.1061/9780784480885.027

Real-Time Defect Detection in Sewer Closed Circuit Television Inspection Videos

2017· article· en· W2743059945 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saeed Moradi, Tarek Zayed

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosed circuitComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Closed circuit television (CCTV) is the most employed technology in inspection of sewer pipelines by municipalities in North America. Generally, visual inspection of sewer pipelines is done manually by a certified operator which is time-consuming, costly, and error-prone due to the operator’s experience or fatigue. Automating the detection of anomalies can reduce time and cost of inspection while ensuring accuracy and quality of assessment. However, various types of defects in sewer pipelines and numerous patterns of each, make it difficult to detect the defects using computer vision techniques. This paper proposes an innovative and efficient anomaly detection algorithm to provide automated detection of sewer defects from data obtained from CCTV inspection videos. The algorithm employs Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for proportional data modeling. The algorithm performs real-time anomaly detection and localization and consists of modeling conditions considered as normal and detecting outliers to this model. The proposed model is tested on videos from sewer inspection report of the City of Laval, to evaluate its performance in anomaly detection in sewer CCTV videos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2017Same topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207