MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745883179 · doi:10.13034/jsst.v10i1.113

Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Sunscreens: Properties, Current Regulations, and Potential Effects on Human and Environmental Wellbeing

2017· article· en· W2745883179 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Katherine Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitanium dioxideNanoparticleEnvironmental scienceBusinessWaste managementNanotechnologyMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 2001 to 2010, the incidence rates of melanomas have increased by over 2% for both Canadian men and women. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles are common additives to sunscreen products. Their ability to render creams and lotions transparent, as well as their use as an ultraviolet light filter makes them a popular choice. Yet their effects on the skin, other organs, and the environment are largely unexplored, giving rise to questions about their safety. Current research findings report that titanium dioxide nanoparticles tend to be less hazardous to organisms than other nanomaterials. Nonetheless, studies on test animals and cell cultures show signi cant neurological, pulmonary, cardiac, and genetic damage once titanium dioxide nanoparticles have been absorbed into the bloodstream through inhalation and ingestion. Nanoparticles are also usually discharged as feces and urine, rinsed off, or disposed of through sewage to enter wastewater treatment plants and released into the surrounding ecosystems. The largest obstacle in nanoparticle research is the lack of consistency in terms of measuring and reporting ndings. Since the amounts of nanoparticles present after experiments are often not recorded, it is difficult to quantify the amount of nanoparticles in our environment and the rate at which they are released. In addition, manufacturers often do not label their products accurately, leading to misinformed consumers and the potential for adverse health effects. It is for these reasons that the scientific community, governments, industries, and environmental groups need to collaborate in the interest of public health and environmental sustainability in order set the precedence for future scientific advancements. This review provides background information on the properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, the effects of such particles on human and environmental health, the current regulations in place in Europe and North America, as well as suggestions for improving consumer safety. De 2001 à 2010, la fréquence des mélanomes avait augmentée par plus de 2% pour les hommes et les femmes canadiens. Les nanoparticules de dioxyde de titane sont des additifs communs dans des produits de protection anti- UV. Elles sont un choix populaire à cause de leur capacité pour rendre les lotions et les crèmes transparentes, et leur fonction comme un filtre des rayons UV. Pourtant, leurs effets sur la peau, les autres organes et l’environnement sont pour la plupart inexplorés, qui provoque des questions concernant la sécurité de leur utilisation. Les résultats courants nous montrent que les nanoparticules de dioxyde de titane sont souvent moins dangereuses pour les organismes que les autres nanomatériaux. Néanmoins, les recherches sur les animaux de laboratoire et les cultures cellulaires montrent qu’il y a des dommages neurologiques, pulmonaires, cardiaques et génétiques assez signifiants une fois que les nanoparticules de dioxyde de titane sont absorbées par le système sanguin au moyen d’inhalation et ingestion. Les nanoparticules sont souvent déchargées du corps comme matières fécales ou urine, enlevées en passant sous l’eau, ou débarrassées dans les eaux usées ou elles peuvent entrer les usines d’assainissement d’eau. Ensuite, ces nanoparticules sont laissées dans les écosystèmes environnants. Le plus grand obstacle dans la recherche des nanoparticules est l’absence d’uniformité concernant la mesure et le rapport des résultats. Bien que les premières mesures des quantités de nanoparticules soient enregistrées, souvent les quantités de nanoparticules présentes après ces études ne sont pas enregistrées. Alors, c’est difficile de chiffrer la quantité de nanoparticules dans notre environnement et le taux auquel elles sont libérées. De plus, c’est rare que les fabricants étiquettent leurs produits d’une manière précise et alors les consommateurs peuvent être mal informés, entrainant la possibilité des effets négatifs sur la santé. Celles-ci sont les raisons pour lesquelles la communauté scientifique, les gouvernements, les industries, et les groupes environnementales ont besoin de collaborer dans les intérêts de la santé publique et la durabilité environnementale pour créer un précédent pour les avancées scientifiques dans le futur. Cet article fournit de information sur les propriétés des nanoparticules de dioxyde de titane, les effets de ces genres de particules sur la santé humaine et environnementale, les régulations courantes mis en place en Europe et Amérique du Nord, ainsi que des suggestions pour l’amélioration de la sécurité des consommateurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student Science and TechnologySame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207