MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751275373

Effects of 6-Week Agility Ladder Drills during Recess Intervention on Dynamic Balance Performance

2017· article· en· W2751275373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of physical education and sport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activityDemographyQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationPhysical educationDisease controlCensusGerontologyPsychologyMedicinePhysical therapyGeographyMedical educationEnvironmental healthSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionLow physical activity (PA) participation rate of youth is a global issue for all the countries (Belanger et al., 2009). A report found that one quarter of the children in the USA did not achieve the recommended 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) participation level every day (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008). Hong Kong youth may be classified as one of the most sedentary populations in the world (Adab & Macfarlane, 1998; Lee & Tsang, 2004). Recently, the Hong Kong report card on physical activity for children and youth revealed that less than half of the children and youth met the recommended physical activity level (Huang et al., 2016). The worse situation was reflected in the results of a territory-wide community fitness survey in Hong Kong, that only 9.5% of boys and 7.0% of girls in the 7 to 12 age group were classified as physically active with an average of the recommended 60 minutes per day of MVPA (Census and Statistics Department, 2013).Hong Kong is one of the highest population density cities in the world, the space-confined school environment limited school children to engage in PA (Johns & Ha, 1999). To address the low levels of PA, schools can provide a significant source of PA for the children by: allotting more Physical Education (PE) periods; increasing amount of MVPA in PE lessons; providing PA during recess time; integrating PA throughout the school day; and providing PA opportunities before and after school (Cox et al., 2011; Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2004; Kriemler et al., 2011; Ng et al., 2016; Pate et al., 2006).Among all the possible strategies, the intervention conducted during recess period is more suitable to Hong Kong situation. It not only can promote the PA level of school-aged children (Escalante et al., 2014; Parrish, Okely, Stanley & Ridgers, 2013; Ridgers, Stratton & Fairclough, 2006; Ridgers et al., 2012), but also minimizes the disturbance of the tight schedule of the children before and after school periods. Moreover, safety concern is guaranteed as the activities were conducted under the supervision of teachers (Ng, 2002; Sum, 2016).The modification of playground setting such as added equipment or materials, playground markings and playground zones is the most common approaches among all the designs and implementations of the recess intervention (Parrish, Okely, Stanley & Ridgers, 2013). Studies were mainly focused on the assessment of the adhesive of the PA level during and after the recess intervention. Only few studies addressed other outcome measures such as the changes of sedentary time and energy expenditure (Ickes, Erwin & Beighle, 2013). Dynamic balance is the ability to maintain a stable base of support while completing a functional task without compromising one's base of support (Winter, Patla & Frank, 1990). It involves a complexity demand of proprioception, range of motion (ROM), and strength (Ricotti, 2011). Agility ladder is a popular piece of equipment for training speed, coordination, balance, and agility of people with different age group, sports and gender (Brown & Ferrigno, 2014; Ricotti, 2011; Sheppard & Young, 2006; White, 2007). There is no study to explore the training effects of agility ladder drills on Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in the elementary school boys during recess intervention. We hypothesized that the dynamic balance ability of the children would be increased after 6-week agility ladder drills during recess period. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 6-week agility ladder drills during recess time on dynamic balance ability in school boys.MethodsParticipantsSeventy-one out of 356 school boys aged 6-13 years old, were recruited from a subsidized Catholic boy's primary school in Western District of Hong Kong during the period of April-June 2016. According to their self-reported health record, none of the children had musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, vestibular, visual, neurologic disorder, surgery or underwent balance training or feet muscle strengthening within 6 months at the time of recruitment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.438 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it