MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752006743 · doi:10.1101/pdb.top083576

Metabolomics in Yeast

2017· article· en· W2752006743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Protocols · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYeastMetabolomicsBudding yeastComputational biologyMetabolic networkBiologyFunction (biology)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeModel organismSystems biologyRegulatorCell metabolismNutrient sensingCell biologyCellBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Budding yeast has from the beginning been a major eukaryotic model for the study of metabolic network structure and function. This is attributable to both its genetic and biochemical capacities and its role as a workhorse in food production and biotechnology. New inventions in analytical technologies allow accurate, simultaneous detection and quantification of metabolites, and a series of recent findings have placed the metabolic network at center stage in the physiology of the cell. For example, metabolism might have facilitated the origin of life, and in modern organisms it not only provides nutrients to the cell but also serves as a buffer to changes in the cellular environment, a regulator of cellular processes, and a requirement for cell growth. These findings have triggered a rapid and massive renaissance in this important field. Here, we provide an introduction to analysis of metabolomics in yeast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it