On the fundamental limits of massive connectivity
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.568
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.132
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
This paper aims to provide an information theoretical analysis of massive device connectivity scenario in which a large number of devices with sporadic traffic communicate in the uplink to a base-station (BS). In each coherence time interval, the BS needs to identify the active devices, to estimate their channels, and to decode the transmitted messages from the devices. This paper first derives an information theoretic upper bound on the overall transmission rate. We then provide a degree-of-freedom (DoF) analysis that illustrates the cost of device identification for massive connectivity. We show that the optimal number of active devices is strictly less than half of the coherence time slots, and the achievable DoF decreases linearly with the number of active devices when it exceeds the number of receive antennas. This paper further presents a two-phase practical framework in which device identification and channel estimation are performed jointly using compressed sensing techniques in the first phase, with data transmission taking place in the second phase. We outline the opportunities in utilizing compressed sensing results to analyze the performance of the overall framework and to optimize the system parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Topic
- Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- University of Toronto
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Base stationCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Coherence timeIdentification (biology)Transmission (telecommunications)Telecommunications linkUpper and lower boundsCompressed sensingInterval (graph theory)Phase (matter)Real-time computingComputer networkElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsAlgorithmEngineeringPhysics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes