Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many radio frequency identification (RFID) applications, such as virtual shopping cart and tag-assisted gaming, involve sensing and recognizing tag mobility. However, existing RFID localization methods are mostly designed for static or slowly moving targets (less than 0.3m/sec). More importantly, we observe that prior methods suffer from serious performance degradation for detecting real-world moving tags in typical indoor environments with multipath interference. In this article, we present i 2 tag, an intelligent mobility-aware activity identification system for RFID tags in multipath-rich environments (e.g., indoors). i 2 tag employs a supervised learning framework based on our novel fine-grain mobility provile, which can quantify different levels of mobility. Unlike previous methods that mostly rely on phase measurement, i 2 tag takes into account various measurements, including RSSI variance, packet loss rate, and our novel relative phase--based fingerprint. Additionally, we design a multidimensional dynamic time warping--based algorithm to robustly detect mobility and the associated activities. We show that i 2 tag is readily deployable using off-the-shelf RFID devices. A prototype has been implemented using a ThingMagic reader and standard-compatible tags. Experimental results demonstrate its superiority in mobility detection and activity identification in various indoor environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".