MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754735044 · doi:10.1002/rnc.3953

Self‐triggered model predictive control for networked control systems based on first‐order hold

2017· article· en· W2754735044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceInterpolation (computer graphics)Zero (linguistics)Control (management)Control systemSIGNAL (programming language)Order (exchange)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In this work, a new self‐triggered model predictive control (STMPC) algorithm is proposed for continuous‐time networked control systems. Compared with existing STMPC algorithms, the proposed STMPC is implemented based on linear interpolation (first‐order hold) rather than the standard zero‐order hold, which helps further reduce the difference between the self‐triggered control signal and the original time‐triggered counterpart and thus reduce the rate of triggering. Based on the first‐order hold implementation, a self‐triggering condition is derived and the corresponding theoretical properties of the closed‐loop system are analyzed. Finally, the comparison between the proposed algorithm and the zero‐order hold–based STMPC is carried out through both theoretical analysis and a simulation example to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it